On 19-02-16 20:09, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
Niels, I think you are right. Your encoder could be moved to ResponseUtils so more could benefit, but perhaps the decision to use it depends on the situation.Is there an alternative implementation in HttpClient / HttpComponents already on the classpath?
Google suggests only doing it yourself as alternative to using |java.net.URLEncoder.
I'll move my improved method to ResponseUtils though, with added flexibility of excluding any special character.
Regards Niels |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
