Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : >> We can proceed with a vote etc, let's start via email and try and >> wrap it up in tonights IRC. No need to remove it right away, the >> process will catch up very soon. > All right. I will wait for PMC decision then. Or vote for it yourself :-) >> Q: Does LGPL count as "unrestricted redistribution" for the above >> mentioned database? > I don't feel so. I don't think that the LGPL license can apply to the > database (and probably not to the derived Java code neither). I don't > know how to words the license in that case. Bleah, hard call I would vote +1 on the module development starting, but would need the license figured out before it was included in a release. Can we stick the database up on a maven repo and then just grab it as a dependency? We encountered the same issue when working with Bryce - perhaps revisiting email can help. >> Q: Is Mr. Cardinal going to be the module maintainer? Or share that >> duty with you while you show him the ropes? > Not sure. For now he is doing the review that I asked him to do. I do > not expect a lot of changes to this module once commited, a little bit > like the only maintenance work required right now for gt2-epsg-hsql is > to update the database when a new one is available. So I was expecting > to be the module maintainer for that one (meaning: just ensuring that > it still working smootly with the main referencing module), and > applying the user-provided patchs if needed. That is cool, may want to ask Mr. Cardinal as it sounds like a nice introduction to geotools development. Jody
_______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
