Andrea Aime ha scritto: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> I think its unfair to say that they "don't work". Are there issues, yes >> undoubtedly. But i have found *many* issues with the old api as part of >> shooting for wfs 1.1. cite compliance. So its just as fair to say that >> the old interfaces "don't work" either. > > Sorry for the rant Justin... trying to port back a test and discover > none of the test do pass because I did use the new filter API and > filters are not being applied was not very nice :-) I should have waited > a bit longer before writing the mail and try to understand why the > code was not called :-p. It may just be a bug in an abstract class > that does hit quite a bit of usages... > I guess the thing is, I did run filters in memory, whilst WFS 1.1 > stuff hits sql converters instead (and never runs filters).
And indeed it was, a tiny difference in AbstractFilter. I'm fixing it. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
