Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
>> I think its unfair to say that they "don't work". Are there issues, yes
>> undoubtedly. But i have found *many* issues with the old api as part of
>> shooting for wfs 1.1. cite compliance. So its just as fair to say that
>> the old interfaces "don't work" either.
> 
> Sorry for the rant Justin... trying to port back a test and discover
> none of the test do pass because I did use the new filter API and 
> filters are not being applied was not very nice :-) I should have waited 
> a bit longer before writing the mail and try to understand why the
> code was not called :-p. It may just be a bug in an abstract class
> that does hit quite a bit of usages...
> I guess the thing is, I did run filters in memory, whilst WFS 1.1
> stuff hits sql converters instead (and never runs filters).

And indeed it was, a tiny difference in AbstractFilter. I'm fixing it.
Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to