Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > I think its unfair to say that they "don't work". Are there issues, yes > undoubtedly. But i have found *many* issues with the old api as part of > shooting for wfs 1.1. cite compliance. So its just as fair to say that > the old interfaces "don't work" either.
Sorry for the rant Justin... trying to port back a test and discover none of the test do pass because I did use the new filter API and filters are not being applied was not very nice :-) I should have waited a bit longer before writing the mail and try to understand why the code was not called :-p. It may just be a bug in an abstract class that does hit quite a bit of usages... I guess the thing is, I did run filters in memory, whilst WFS 1.1 stuff hits sql converters instead (and never runs filters). Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
