Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> I would like that Geotools 2.4 branch contains the old EPSG factory 
> implementation with class renamed, but without the work on the way.

Wondering... have things been done so that it's not possible
to use the old framework keeping the new one in parallel? Imho
a very thin percentage of users will benefit from an increased
scalability in the CRS subsystem, since usually a single user
base plays with some 3-4 CRS at a time (once cached, they should
be darn fast to get out of the CRS subsystem, no?).
Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to