Quoting Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Wondering... have things been done so that it's not possible > to use the old framework keeping the new one in parallel?
Andrea it is the same framework. In terms of implementation I have decided not to patch up Martin's origional superclasses (they were serving too many goals). Let me be explicit ... BufferedAuthorityFactory: 1- acted as a decorator (wrapping an existing CRS Authority and offering buffering on it) 2- acted as a super class for a class that wanted to have a buffer 3- acted as a "buffered" backpointer for a direct crs authority I have made each one of these uses into a seperate superclass; and then started derrviing the origional implementations from this new base. The existing superclasses are: a) still there b) still in use As the replacements are provied we will cut over one at a time. > a very thin percentage of users will benefit from an increased > scalability in the CRS subsystem, since usually a single user > base plays with some 3-4 CRS at a time (once cached, they should > be darn fast to get out of the CRS subsystem, no?). The major benifit for the casual user is the use of an ObjectCache to manage things; they will be able to control when connections are returned. I know we have focused on how many connections to take - but that is not the only thing happening here. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
