Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Wondering... have things been done so that it's not possible
> to use the old framework keeping the new one in parallel?
For now the old classes are kept relatively stable. But with the work hapenning
directly in the referencing module, we will have to choose one or the other at
the end. It would be easier to let the choice to the users if the two
alternatives were in separated modules.
I believe that it will be nice to replace the old classes with new Jody's and
Cory's work, because there is really nice idea in their proposal. I just
believe
that we can not garantee a stable new framework in two weeks, which is why I
would like to postdone to Geotools 2.5.
> Imho a very thin percentage of users will benefit from an increased
> scalability in the CRS subsystem, since usually a single user
> base plays with some 3-4 CRS at a time (once cached, they should
> be darn fast to get out of the CRS subsystem, no?).
Yes exactly :). Frankly, I really have a hard time to imagine who will want to
create thousands of CRS in a very short amount of time (short enough to make
concurrency worthly).
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
