Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > I just modified the "fix versions" for a bunch of Jira task. > > I would like to make a proposal: Up to date we were trying to give a > "fix versions" to every issues on the basis that "unknown" fix versions > fall in a black hole. I believe that this approach has an unwanted side > effect. At least for myself, when I look on JIRA, the next Geotools > releases are synonymous to "unknown" release to me, so I just never look > at the JIRA tasks listed at them. > > I suggest to accept the "unknown" status; they will not be forgetten if > they are assigned to an active contributor. I suggest to choose a "fix > version" release only if we are really planning to work on this issue > for that release. I believe that "fix versions" closer to the truth will > make browsing on our JIRA web site more valuable.
Heh, I don't know. Every issue that's not assigned to a release basically does not exist to me, since I have my hands full with the ones scheduled against a release (and for me, scheduled against a release means a Geoserver one, fixing gt2 issues is a by product of that). I'm not against leaving issues unscheduled, but we should make clear to users that this will mean "no interest/resources for fixing it, you're on your own". Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
