Okay. How do I go about getting a consensus from "everyone involved"?
Graham Chris Holmes wrote: >Afaik we're at LGPL v2. It's probably one that says version 2 or later, >which means anyone's allowed to do the upgrade to version 3. But we >should decide as a project if we want to, get consensus from everyone >involved. > >As far as I know v3 has no major downside and has a nice upside that helps >us - compatibility with apache license. So I'm definitely for upgrading >to v3. > >best regards, > >Chris > >On Tue, July 17, 2007 2:33 pm, Graham Davis wrote: > > >>I'm starting work on the IP review for the geometry module (not fun!) >>and noticed that the LICENSE.txt file seems to have the LGPL v2.1 text in >>it. The POM file for my module however, links to: >>http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.txt which is version 3. Should the >>LICENSE.txt files be updated with this new text from the v3 file? >> >> >>-- >>Graham Davis >>Refractions Research Inc. >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take >>control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. >>http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>_______________________________________________ >>Geotools-devel mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >> >> >>!DSPAM:4005,469d0c9570262143011171! >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- Graham Davis Refractions Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
