Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Yes I remember that it was your suggestion, and I'm adopting it. We don't need
> the alternative for "STRICT" that you mentionned in the remainder of your 
> email
> - it is just FactoryFinder(hints) with empty hints.
>   
Not sure I understand; the hints provided to the constructor are not 
combined with the global hints in any way? We rely on the
programmer to do that prior to calling the constructor?
> The main difference in my proposal was that I didn't proposed to make the
> FactoryFinder(Hints) constructor public (on intend - my usual conservative
> approach), but we could if you think that we should.
>   
Note my suggestion was in two parts; make the constructor public; and 
remove the parameter from the create methods.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to