Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >> Note my suggestion was in two parts; make the constructor public; and >> remove the parameter from the create methods. >> > Ah, I missed the "remove the Hints parameter from the create method"... > > I didn't though about that... I guess we just need to do a quick check on how > we > use the FactoryFinder.getFooFactory(...) in GeoTools code base and see if it > would be convenient (would we have to invoke "new > FactoryFinder(hints).createFooFactory()" most of the time, or would we share a > few FactoryFinder existing instances most of the time?) > Updated your page with a BEFORE / AFTER example of how ReferencingFactoryFinder would change... - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ReferencingFactoryFinder+incompatible+change
Please review; at the very least so I know I am understanding the problem correctly :-) Also saw your use of ReferencingFactoryFinder.NULL_HINTS - am I correct in thinking this is similar to the functionality you want STRICT to have? Cheers, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
