Looks good Martin; going to ask for a vote next? I was expecting this to be a topic during todays IRC meeting. Jody
> Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: >> Updated the proposal >> >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ReferencingFactoryFinder+incompatible+change >> >> >> >> I tried to make my intend a little bit more explicit: the user hints >> specified >> in method signatures are merged with the hints specified at >> construction time, >> and optionnaly with global hints. This is why in my proposal the >> Hints argument >> was left in the method signatures: it is a complement, not a >> replacement, of >> hints specified at construction time since hints are merged rather than >> replaced. The intented semantic is "as specified at construction time >> with only >> that hints changed - all other ones untouched". The hint that we want >> to change >> that way without touching the others is >> Hints.FORCE_LONGITUDE_FIRST_AXIS_ORDER. > > Sounds good to me. +1 (thought I guess we'll talk about that in > today's gt2 meeting right?) > Cheers > Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
