Go for it martin; although you may find that moving the sde dummy code 
is a bit of fun; I seem to recall some profile madness being used to 
determine if dummy jars were used or not?
> Jody Garnett a écrit :
>> Should these be placed in the existing "build" folder; as they are 
>> only required for building ...
>
> Yes, this is exactly what I'm proposing.
>
> The build folder currently contains the following sub-folders:
>
>   - eclipse
>   - fixture
>   - maven
>
> I'm suggesting to add a "dummy" sub-folder and group all dummy stuff 
> there, including moving the currently existing one (I'm aware of only 
> arcsde at this time).
>
>     Martin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to