Hey all, I'm a little hesitant to move the sde-dummy code away from the sde module. It is true that it's only used (currently) for building, but why does that mean that we should move it away from its current home?
I guess I just think that the sde-dummy module isn't really of any general use, except to the arcsde-datastore module. the jaxb-dummy module, however, *may* be of use to many plugins, so perhaps it could have a more general location? Is there a more convincing argument for "move the sde-dummy module" than, "there are other dummy modules that are more broadly useful, and we should put them all together"? --saul On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 18:16 +0100, Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : > > Go for it martin; although you may find that moving the sde dummy code > > is a bit of fun; I seem to recall some profile madness being used to > > determine if dummy jars were used or not? > > I would do this part only after the "gt2-prefix removal" work then... > > Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
