Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : >> This will be a tough one; I am strict about the need to support both >> ISO Geometry and JTS Geometry. I think I mentioned these ideas (and a >> JTS 2.0) in one of the planning emails. > The way I see the design, GeoTools core would work strictly on ISO > geometries (which may be wrappers around JTS), but plugins and > extensions could work on JTS (extracting them from ISO wrappers) if > they wish. I know; I am respectfully disagreeing on this one.
Just like we expect features to work on invalid data; and we have expression to isolate us from differences of attribute definition; you also have expression to isolate end user code from differences of Geometry implementation if need be. I am not sure what the time line is for the ISO Geometry work? The existing wrapper based implementation is not very well done. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
