Thanks Adrian; we have a similar understanding of the problem. Actually I venture to suggest my lack of understanding exceeds yours :-) Jody
Adrian Custer wrote: > The JTS-Wrapper vision does not convince me yet since I'm not sure that > it is possible to logically integrate the capabilities of such a module > into GeoTools. There might be some way to make a jts-wrapper module act > as the spatial representation for applications implementing only iso > 19125 (ISO Simple Feature Geometry), if that spec specifically restricts > implementation to cartesian 2D spaces---I have not yet found the line > where that restriction is established but, based on the purpose of the > spec, it seems that's what they want to do. However, this limitation to > cartesian 2D CRS's only places the jts-wrapper in a strange space that I > don't yet understand how to integrate within a more complex library. We > are going to have to setup library wide flags so users can work in > 'ISO19125' conditions only and, if done right, in that case we could > swap in a jts-wrapper module. That design is yet to be determined. > > there will be more complexity before I understand this beast, > --adrian > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
