Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > On the 2.5-RC0 release, the referencing module is not ready at all... Do we have a list of what needs to be done? > Given that it is the case for a long time, what should be the action? I think you should ask for help; and possible recruit a second module maintainer. > * Release as is anyway with big warning and all EPSG factories as > deprecated classes so we can edit them later What is the sepcific problem with the EPSG factories > * Do not release referencing and make the rest of geotools depends > on gt-referencing-2.4. I think we can explore this kind of police for GeoTools 3 (see previous emails about that); but for now it is so much more sane for en-users if they can know all the versions that work togehter in one go. > * Any other idea? You may need to roll back the 2.5.x branch to 2.4.x levels? Or you may want to negotiate with Eclesia about his deadline of the 15th? Worst case is we start the 2.5.x branch on the 15th and leave it open while referencing is cleaned up? Making a release candidate when you are ready? I would like to keep thursday in mind as a target date; so we can have a release "ready" to associate with OSGeo graduation announcement.
Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
