Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Eclesia's deadline is not a "strong" one.
oh - well we have been working very hard to make sure we meet this 
deadline. I would still like to sort this stuff out this week and have 
things squared away for OSGeo Graduation; you will also find GeoServer 
1.7 waiting to pounce.

So even with Eclesia safely isolated; there are lots of remaining 
drivers to push the referencing work along. Please let me know if there 
is anything I can do to help.
Jody
> We are slowly setting up mercurial repositories in our organization, 
> and Eclesia now have his own. It was really needed because Eclesia, 
> Cédric and Guihem all have different local changes in their GeoTools 
> copy, those changes are not yet ready to be commited to GeoTools SVN 
> and nevertheless we need to share them among us.
>
> This means that the deadline can be relaxed more easily since we are 
> becoming a little bit less dependent of GeoTools SVN. Do we have any 
> idea what is the time frame for GeoServer?
>
> Otherwise, making the changes on the 2.5 branch together with trunk is 
> workable as well.
>
>     Martin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to