I would be okay with trying a different management strategy; consensus amung
module maintainers would be nice for example. We do have an obligation to
the OSGeo to have a committee representative that can be contacted; other
than that we can be flexible.
You call for though on roll and participation will take some thinking on my
part before I reply. Much like the geotidy project I would like to be able
to take more decisive action (in terms of scope and code bloat) then we can
other the present arrangement. I am however pleased with how transparent our
process is in terms of change procedures and the adoption of new unsupported
modules.
Cheers,
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
