Simone Giannecchini ha scritto: > > 1> We do not step down as a whole, but each one should *really* decide > if he wants to take part of the game. We may also propose new names > for the PMC as part of this. > 2> We need to define more clearly the role of PMC members and we also > need to define ways to remove members based on consensus with the
At the moment I can only symphatize and tell you that I'm too having troubles dealing with the current situation. I cannot tell you what we're going to do (as OpenGeo), but next week we're going to have an OpenGeo summit in New York and certainly the relationship between GeoServer, GeoTools and OpenGeo will be a topic. Hopefully after discussing it we'll have a solid opinion on what to do next (or at least a set of options), and with enough resource backing to take whatever road we might decide to follow. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
