I have a problem with the term neogeography because as you said:
"The Geoweb has revolutionized digital cartography and GIScience. The
revolutionaries are neogeographers."
It is affecting cartography and GIScience, not geography, at least in
the sense geography is understood in germany.
The Problem of that whole discussion is, that the people who invented
build and use geoweb applications are mostly not geographers in terms of
a scientific/educational background.
I would think that this discussion is totally meaningless to the most
geographers at my department, who are researching for example issues of
"N fluxes in the environment", "international networks", "vulnerability
in megacities" and so on.
There is no problem to write a Ph.D. thesis in geography about how
geoweb is affecting people in everyday descisionmaking or something like
that, but it is just meaningless for the far most questions of geography.
So, what I want to say is, that there is no devide between "neo" and
"paleo" as you describe it as "antithetical to traditional geography",
there is a new field for geography to research. Nothing more and nothing
less in my eyes.
best regards,
Christian
R E Sieber schrieb:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm thinking of proposing a panel at Where 2.0 and I'd like your
> suggestions. This would be the sister panel of one I've already
> organized for this year's Association of American Geographers' Annual
> Conference (to be held mid-March in Las Vegas; AAG being the land of the
> paleos). Here's the abstract for the AAG panel.
>
> Panel: Neogeographers meet Paleogeographers
>
> The Geoweb has revolutionized digital cartography and GIScience. The
> revolutionaries are neogeographers. According to Turner (2006),
> “Neogeography is about people using and creating their own maps, on
> their own terms and by combining elements of an existing toolset”.
> Toolsets involve user-generated geospatial content (aka volunteered
> geographic information): geotagged Flickr photographs, Google Maps
> Mashups, Open Street maps, and loopt. It’s more than software or
> Internet apps, “The geoaware Web isn’t a product we buy; it’s an
> environment we colonize" (Udall 2005).
>
> Neogeography is posited as antithetical to traditional geography. To
> neos, GIScience appears fixated on data accuracy, vetting and
> documentation. Critical GIS makes dire pronouncements for geospatial
> gadgetry. Neogeographers call for flexible and playful artistic
> engagement with place (a “dissident cartographic aesthetic”, {Holmes
> 2006}). Neogeographers, birthed in wikipedia ideologies of
> egalitarianism and disdain for expertise, believe in “radical openness”
> (Udall 2005). GIScience is seen as a closed (and, coincidentally,
> insufficiently computational) enterprise, relying on clubbiness and on
> proprietary software. With this characterization, can neo and paleo ever
> be reconciled?
>
> Panelists come from both camps, and will consider four questions. 1.
> What is the landscape of UGGC and what does it reveal about the deeper
> social and political implications of the Geoweb? 2. What can each camp
> offer the other and what are the barriers impeding communication? 3.
> What role does expertise hold in colonizing the Geoweb? 4. If neo is the
> current thing then what is post-neo? Panelists will seek linkages among
> paleo, neo, and geo.
>
> AAG Panel has me, Andre Skupin, Martin Dodge, Sean Gorman, and Andrew
> Turner.
>
>
> What I need for Where is suggestions for panelists. It'd have to be
> fairly small. I've talk to Sean Gorman and Andrew Turner and they're
> game. Probably only one other neogeographer/geowanker (if that). What I
> need are one-two paleos who are attending Where.
>
> Also, you'll notice that the above abstract is a bit hard on the paleos
> and gracious to the neos. What I'd need is some wording that's gracious
> to the paleos. Can you think of good things to say about traditional
> cartographer and GIScience? (Obviously I can, but I'm curious as to
> others' impressions.)
>
> Thanks,
> Renee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geowanking mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
>
_______________________________________________
Geowanking mailing list
[email protected]
http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
