And I know he's heading out on vacation, but Dave also came up with this shortened-time version. Note the different types of groups... Best, Timmons
*CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY – RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK* Rainforest Action Network campaigns for the forests, their inhabitants and the natural systems that sustain life by transforming the global marketplace through education, grassroots organizing and non-violent direct action. Big banks are the ATMs for the dirty energy economy that causes water contamination, cancer, and climate change. So we’ve been relentless in holding corporations like Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Goldman Sachs accountable for their risky investments. Because of the work of activists, banks are divesting from dirty energy <http://understory.ran.org/2014/01/10/%20%20goldman-sachs-sacks-coal-export-investment> . We are fighting alongside people directly impacted by dirty energy to challenge the corporations that are poisoning their communities. In the heart of Appalachia, we’re pressuring banks to stop funding mountaintop removal <http://understory.ran.org/2014/01/10/goldman-sachs-sacks-%20coal-export-investment/>. Where U.S. banks look to profit from dirty energy abroad, we work with local communities to block dodgy deals <http://understory.ran.org/2013/09/24/coal-india-to-%20investors-whats-a-few-billion-tons-of-coal-between-friends/> . BEHIND EVERY COALMINE stands a bank. Currently, the United States is the world’s second largest coal producer. But the facts are irrefutable: Coal is a huge driver of climate change; we can’t keep global temperature rise below two degrees if we continue to burn coal. That’s why RAN is systematically pushing the banking sector to cut their ties to the coal industry and to cease the financing of new and existing coal plants, extraction and infrastructure. We are pushing banks to quantify their overall annual emissions — with the aim of eventually reducing those emissions to zero. RAN has made it clear to US banks: Investing in coal equals and extreme investment — with extreme global consequences. There needs to be no further financing for companies pursuing new coal-fired power plants or retrofits of existing coal-fired power plants; no financing for coal export infrastructure; and no financing for mountaintop removal coal mining. And the banks are listening. In April of 2014, JPMorgan Chase and the Royal Bank of Scotland updated their environmental policies, and ended their relationships with the biggest mountaintop removal coal mining companies. This followed similar actions by Wells Fargo and Bank of the West. The gap is widening between banks that have cut ties with extreme coal companies and those still holding on to financially and environmentally disastrous relationships. Bank of America, for example, continues these practices and continues to be a high-profile subject of RAN campaigns. However, even as high-profile bankruptcies and costly environmental cleanup settlements illustrate the growing risks involved with lending to coal companies, US banks still provided $31 billion in financing for coal in 2013. *Citigroup is the top financier of US coal-fired power plants, with Barclays as the lead financier of mountaintop removal (MTR) coal mining. * In the Summer of 2014, RAN became aware of an outrageous proposal to dredge the Great Barrier Reef in order to accommodate an expanded coal exporting program in Queensland, Australia. RAN immediately began negotiating with the largest banks in the United States to solicit their commitments to avoid this project. In a relatively short turn around, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase all provided RAN with public commitments stating that they would not bankroll the project. Previously, five major European banks had also publicly ruled out investment in this proposal, known as the Abbot Point project. If Abbot Point moves forward it will unlock one of the world’s largest untapped stores of carbon, the Galilee Basin. Nine new mega coal mines are currently planned for the Galilee Basin, five of which would be bigger than any coalmine currently operating in Australia. If fully developed, these mines would produce up to 330 million metric tons of coal per year to be burned and releasing massive amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. *Questions:* [THE WHAT] What is the problem that you have defined for your campaign? How does it build on your existing work and mission? [THE WHAT] What are the specific objectives that you will achieve if provided these funds? (List these on the board) [THE HOW] What strategies will you employ to achieve your objectives? (For example, shareholder activism, targeted media efforts, civil disobedience, advertisements, policy reports, etc.) [THE HOW] How do you propose that RAN spend the $100,000? Make a budget pie chart explaining exactly how it would be used. (For example, hiring new staff, paying for research and publication materials, purchased advertising, media work, purchasing technologies, bailing people out of jail, etc.) [THE WHY] Why is corporate responsibility the best strategy for social change and addressing climate change? Why should we fund you above all other proposals? Draw on class readings, lectures, and guest speakers to make your case. SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES: BAY LOCALIZE Bay Localize inspires and supports community leaders in building equitable, resilient communities. We confront the challenges of climate instability, rising energy costs, and recession by boosting regional capacity to provide for everyone's needs, sustainably and equitably. We achieve this by equipping local leaders with flexible tools, models, and policies that strengthen their communities. Humanity is at a turning point. We're using so much of the Earth's resources that we're endangering the very life-support systems upon which we all depend. At the same time, too many people in our communities are going without the basics to lead healthy lives. The task of our generation is to learn to live happily on fewer resources, to distribute these resources equitably, and to make our communities resilient enough to withstand the bumps in the road along the way. The goal is clear. Reaching it means coming to terms with climate change, our addiction to oil, and deep social inequalities. Bay Localize creates innovative solutions for communities to meet basic needs in ways that harness local resources creatively, sustainably, and equitably. We catalyze change at the community level by providing tools to chart a path to resilience, and ramping up good models to scale through local policy change. Bay Localize focuses our work where we live in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area, but our tools and models are replicated throughout the country and the world. Bay Localize believes that vibrant local economies and healthy communities are the answer to our growing challenges. They are the best safeguard against global insecurity, an essential part of achieving social equity, and a vital way to enrich our day-to-day lives. The *Community Resilience Toolkit 2.0* is a collection of online tools to help you understand local impacts of the climate and energy crisis in your region and what you can do about them. The tools are for individuals, community groups, teachers, and municipal planners. They come with easy instructions to facilitate community resilience workshops. The *Bay Area Resilient Communities Initiative (RCI)* is creating a national model of resilience planning led by the communities most impacted by climate change and natural disasters for the benefit of all residents. Local governments lack the resources needed to fully prepare for climate change and natural disasters on their own. Working with community groups is a cost-effective and efficient way to develop policy and programs that work for all residents, especially those who are most vulnerable and hardest to reach. The RCI is a coalition of community organizations throughout the nine-county Bay Area that bring decades of experience in improving the quality of life of our region. The *Green Your City *program demonstrates how cities can meet basic needs of food, water, and energy locally and sustainably. The Green Your City program has been invited by members of the food justice movement to help lead a strategic campaign to change outdated codes to allow urban farmers to sell their safe and healthy produce locally, from within their neighborhoods. We predict this strategic change will help East Bay residents weather spikes in food prices, create microbusiness opportunities for the underemployed, and increase consumption of healthy fruits and vegetables. The *Local Clean Energy Alliance *has been collaborating with other partners around the U.S. to establish a national Energy Democracy Project to popularize and build a national movement to democratize energy. As part of this, we work for Community Choice energy, which enables cities and other jurisdictions to choose where the electricity provided to their residents and businesses will come from. This means that local communities can decide to procure their electricity from renewable energy sources: either by purchasing renewable electricity on the market, or more importantly, by developing local renewable energy resources in the community. *Questions:* [THE WHAT] What is the problem that you have defined for your campaign? How does it build on your existing work and mission? [THE WHAT] What are the specific objectives that you will achieve if provided these funds? (List these on the board) [THE HOW] What strategies will you employ to achieve your objectives? [THE HOW] How do you propose that Bay Localize spend the $100,000? Make a budget pie chart explaining exactly how it would be used. (For example, hiring new staff, paying for research and publication materials, technology, publications, etc.) [THE WHY] Why is community sustainability the best strategy for social change and addressing climate change? Why should we fund you above all other proposals? Draw on class readings, lectures, and guest speakers to make your case. DIRECT ACTION, SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, AND STUDENT MOBILIZATION: 350.org 350.org is building a global climate movement. Our online campaigns, grassroots organizing, and mass public actions are coordinated by a global network active in over 188 countries. We believe that a global grassroots movement can hold our leaders accountable to the realities of science and the principles of justice. That movement is rising from the bottom up all over the world, and is uniting to create the solutions that will ensure a better future for all. When we started organizing in 2008, we saw climate change as the most important issue facing humanity — but climate action was mired in politics and all but stalled. We didn’t know how to fix things, but we knew that one missing ingredient was a climate movement that reflected the scale of the crisis. So we started organizing coordinated days of action that linked activists and organizations around the world, including the International Day of Climate Action in 2009, the Global Work Party in 2010, Moving Planet in 2011, and Climate Impacts Day in 2012. We held the “world’s biggest art installation” and “the most widespread day of political action in the planet’s history.” We figured that if we were going to be a movement, then we had to start acting like one. Today, 350.org works in almost every country in the world on campaigns like fighting coal power plants in India, stopping the Keystone XL pipeline in the U.S, and divesting public institutions everywhere from fossil fuels. All of our work leverages people power to dismantle the influence and infrastructure of the fossil fuel industry, and to develop people-centric solutions to the climate crisis. *Climate marches: *We played an instrumental role, among many movement partners, in organizing the People’s Climate March, the climate game-changer of 2014. We came together to let world leaders know that there is widespread support for political action on climate and a transformed vision for climate action. With 400,000 people marching in New York City and hundreds of thousands more joining 2,646 events in 162 countries in such cities as London, Sydney, New Delhi, and Sao Paolo, it became the largest climate march in history. *Keystone XL and other extreme energy organizing:* Throughout 2014, we held 45 separate actions to pressure President Obama to reject the Keystone XL Pipeline. One of the larger actions was in April, where we helped support the Cowboy-Indian Alliance as they held the Reject & Project rally. On April 26th, thousands of people joined us to demonstrate that the Keystone XL pipeline and the tar sands must be rejected — to protect this, and future generations. Our press outreach garnered media coverage from 83 national outlets, 54 state and regional outlets, and 36 international outlets. We have also been working with a wide array of partners to build grassroots support for a ban on fracking in California. Over the course of the year, we organized Don’t Frack California, one of the largest fracking rallies in history. Over 4,000 people surrounded the state capitol in Sacramento. We worked with affected communities to collect stories about how fracking is impacting their lives, and we have garnered media attention countering the narrative that fracking is “safe.” *Divestment campaigns: *Since 2012, 181 institutions and local governments and nearly 700 individuals have pledged to divest from fossil fuels — representing over $50 billion USD in assets. The fossil fuel divestment movement has grown faster than any previous divestment campaign in history. The fossil fuel divestment campaign is now on nearly 450 campuses, and it has spread to cities and churches in the US and in Australia, New Zealand, the UK, The Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, and Germany. Hundreds of local divestment campaigns have been launched on the GoFossilFree.org website, including active campaigns in some of the United States’ largest cities such as New York and Los Angeles. In 2014, we trained over 600 people at workshops across the country, and we held smaller trainings particularly around negotiation. Local groups worked with 350.org staff to pursue a strategy to push state level pension funds, especially CALPERS and NYPERS to pursue divestment. In Europe, the campaign moved very quickly with successes in Sweden, Norway, The Netherlands, and in the United Kingdom where over 40 universities took up the campaign. In New Zealand, the Anglican Church of Aotearoa New Zealand and Polynesia and the Dunedin City Council voted to divest from fossil fuels. In Australia, we pressured big banks such as Westpac, ANZ, NAB, and Commonwealth Bank and encouraged the public to switch banks. *Questions:* [THE WHAT] What is the problem that you have defined for your campaign? How does it build on your existing work and mission? [THE WHAT] What are the specific objectives that you will achieve if provided these funds? (List these on the board) [THE HOW] What strategies will you employ to achieve your objectives? (For example, grassroots organizing, campus organizing and divestment campaigns, civil disobedience, communication technology, climate marches, etc.) [THE HOW] How do you propose that 350.org spend the $100,000? Make a budget pie chart explaining exactly how it will be used. (For example, hiring new staff, developing new technologies, media work, bailing people out of jail, etc. – be specific) [THE WHY] Why is direct action and mobilization the best strategy for social change and addressing climate change? Why should we fund you above all other proposals? Draw on class readings, lectures, and guest speakers to make your case. CORPORATE PARTNERSHIPS, MARKET CHANGE, POLICY ADVOCACY: ENVIROMENTAL DEFENSE FUND What if Ph.D. scientists, economists, MBAs and policy experts could work together to solve environmental problems? It’s happening every day at Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). The diverse skills that we apply to each environmental challenge create opportunities for alliances that produce lasting change. at EDF, we’re harnessing one of the most powerful forces in the modern world — the pursuit of profit — for the common good. How: By helping craft markets in which investors, inventors and entrepreneurs have an economic incentive to protect the environment. *Corporate Partnerships to Reduce Methane Emissions: *We’ve learned there is a huge opportunity to reduce emissions of methane—a greenhouse gas 84 times more potent than CO2 during its first 20 years in the atmosphere—and slow the rate of climate change in our lifetimes. With allies like Conservation Colorado, we set our sights on a state where a drilling boom had stirred conflict between industry and communities. EDF president Fred Krupp and our team began meeting with Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, who asked EDF to join industry and other groups to craft a solution. Today, the state has the nation’s strongest air pollution rules for oil and gas operations and the first direct regulation of methane. How did this happen? Three of the state’s biggest producers—Anadarko, Encana and Noble—saw that their social license to operate was at risk. They stepped up. The rules slash methane emissions by more than 30% and cut air pollution as much as getting all the cars and trucks off the road in Colorado. We’re using the rules as a template to support federal action and in other states where EDF is fighting to reduce air pollution. *CO2 Energy Policy: *On June 2, 2014, the United States finally started getting serious about global climate change. That morning the Environmental Protection Agency, in an action long advocated by EDF, proposed the Clean Power Plan, the first-ever national standards to cut carbon dioxide pollution from existing power plants. Fossil fuel plants cause about a third of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, more than any other source. Throughout the process, EDF and allies have been pushing for deep reductions. We are showing how our clean energy work in key states already achieved steep cuts. Colorado, for example, passed bipartisan legislation, backed by EDF, that will improve air quality while ensuring a reliable supply of electricity. Going forward, we’ll work with states to help implement the final rules. “The new plan will drive innovation, allowing America to lead in clean technologies,” says EDF attorney Megan Ceronsky. “And it will make our air safer to breathe.” As expected, major coal interests and their supporters in Congress have vowed to scuttle the plan. Anticipating the barrage, EDF joined with allies like the American Lung Association to launch a campaign —in the courts, on Capitol Hill and with the public—to ensure the final rules are strong. EDF Action, our political lobbying partner, has already been instrumental in beating back legislation that would have defunded EPA. But future attacks are expected. EPA’s authority to act was established in a series of court cases in which EDF played a role, including at the Supreme Court, which ruled in 2007 that the Clean Air Act applies to greenhouse gas emissions. Since then, EDF has worked with, and sometimes sued, EPA to secure carbon pollution protections. The Clean Power Plan would cut emissions from the power sector by 30% from 2005 levels by 2030. It gives states flexibility in meeting their targets, whether by deploying renewable energy, ramping up energy efficiency or creating regional carbon markets to achieve reductions at the lowest cost. EPA estimates that for every $1 invested in complying with the plan, Americans will gain $7 in health benefits. Throughout the process, EDF and allies have been pushing for deep reductions. We are showing how our clean energy work in key states already achieved steep cuts. Colorado, for example, passed bipartisan legislation, backed by EDF, that will improve air quality while ensuring a reliable supply of electricity. Going forward, we’ll work with states to help implement the final rules. *Questions:* [THE WHAT] What is the problem that you have defined for your work? How does it build on your existing work and mission? [THE WHAT] What are the specific objectives that you will achieve if provided these funds (list these on the board)? [THE HOW] What strategies will you employ to achieve your objectives? (For example, partnerships with corporations, lobbying, etc. – be specific) [THE HOW] How do you propose that 350.org spend the $100,000? Make a budget pie chart explaining exactly how it will be used. (For example, hiring new staff, conducting research, paying lobbyists, etc. – be specific) [THE WHY] Why is corporate partnerships and leveraging the market the best strategy for social change and addressing climate change? Why should we fund you above all other proposals? Draw on class readings, lectures, and guest speakers to make your case. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Roberts, J. Timmons < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Jessica and all, > > Dave Ciplet (now at UC-Boulder) did this simulation in our Power, Justice > and Climate Change class in 2013 and we've both done it since a couple > times. It pits NGOs against each other in the search for (a fictitious) > foundation funding. This is the reality, sadly, for environmental NGOs, > and/but the work gets the students diving into what their group is doing. > You can have students work in pairs or threesomes in drafting these 2-3 > page proposals, which they summarize for the class, and then one group is > the funding agency who determines which to fund. We have used contrasting > types of groups, like Greenpeace, Oxfam, Nature Conservancy, some small and > grassroots and EJ or Climate Justice groups, and so on. This is for a twice > a week class, so they have 1-2 days prep beforehand to peruse the groups' > websites. he has cooked up a shorter version for times without the advance > prep. > > Total credit goes to Dave for this awesome activity. > > Best, > Timmons > > *Roberts Foundation Sustainable Development Guidelines* > > MISSION STATEMENT AND PROGRAMS > > Founded in 2013, the Roberts Foundation advances social change that > contributes to a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world. Our > grantmaking is organized around three themes: Democratic Practice, > Peacebuilding, and Sustainable Development. Though the Fund pursues its > three program interests in a variety of geographic contexts, it has > identified several specific locations on which to concentrate > cross-programmatic attention. The Fund refers to these as " pivotal > places": subnational areas, nation-states, or cross-border regions that > have special importance with regard to the Foundation’s substantive > concerns and whose future will have disproportionate significance for the > future of a surrounding region, an ecosystem, or the world. Discerning and > communicating the impact of our grantmaking and other program activities > are essential to fulfilling our mission and commitment to stewardship, > transparency, and accountability. The Foundation carefully monitors > performance—both institutional effectiveness and program impact. > > SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES > > Human activity is causing climate change, rapid loss of biodiversity, and > accelerating degradation of Earth’s life support systems. These > developments threaten the livelihoods, health, and security of people in > all nations and cultures as well as the well-being of the greater community > of life. > > > > The Roberts Foundation’s sustainable development grantmaking endeavors to > address these challenges by supporting development that meets the needs of > the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet > their own needs. The program supports global stewardship that is > ecologically based, economically sound, socially just, culturally > appropriate, and consistent with intergenerational equity. The Foundation > encourages government, business, and civil society to work collaboratively > on climate change, to acknowledge the moral and ethical consequences of > inaction, and to make it an integral part of all development planning and > activity. Recognizing the global nature of many environmental problems, the > Fund also promotes international cooperation in addressing these challenges. > > > > The Sustainable Development program maintains a significant focus on the > United States in light of its disproportionate impact on the global > economy, politics, and the environment. The Foundation’s Global Governance > portfolio supports broad participation in forging the international > agreements and institutional arrangements needed to encourage investment in > sustainable development. Foundation staff work to ensure that global > developments inform work in specific places and that locally grounded > efforts generate lessons and innovations needed for global impact. > > > > With the recognition that the impact of unchecked climate change threatens > all other conservation efforts, the Sustainable Development program focuses > its U.S. grantmaking on building a green economy at the federal, state, and > local levels. > > > > *Goal: Advancing Solutions to Climate Change* > > > > *Strategies:* > > • Building public and policymaker understanding and support for a > range of actions to address the threat of climate change. > > • Supporting implementation efforts to build a clean energy economy at > the federal, state, and local levels. > > • Supporting efforts to reduce reliance on carbon-intensive energy > sources. > > • Supporting targeted efforts to advance international progress on > climate change. > > > > REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL: > > Given the strengths, strategies and missions of your organization, please > submit a three-page (single space) proposal for grant funding to advance > solutions to climate change. We have a budget of $5 million dollars that we > are seeking to allocate for 2014 to best achieve this goal and related > strategies. We anticipate dividing up this funding among a handful of > organizations. Please include in your proposal a statement of your mission, > how you understand the roots of the climate problem and the necessary > solutions, relevant recent accomplishments of your organization, your > strategies and plan of action for using the funding, why you think your > approach is a good fit with our foundation, and how you will evaluate > whether you have achieved success. Please include a specific dollar amount > that you are requesting, and a rough budget of how the funding will be used > (specific projects and activities, staffing needs, overhead, etc.). Please > include your organization’s total annual revenue and expenses. Be prepared > to give a 5-minute pitch to our Foundation’s Executive Board about the > merits of your proposal. > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Dabelko, Geoffrey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Jessica, >> >> >> >> In an environmental leadership class, I’ve found good engagement from >> focusing on the Goldman Prize winners. For reasonably sized classes I >> assign each student one year of award winners to review. The Goldman >> website has short overviews of each winner organized by year, their >> acceptance speeches, and short videos about them). Depending on class size, >> I have them write short strength/weaknesses pieces and/or pick one to >> feature in a short presentation to the class (and if time allows, we watch >> a couple of the short profile videos). >> >> >> >> To provide some overview structure, I assign the piece Jeff Langholz and >> a number of his students did analyzing a couple of decades of Goldman >> winners. Their breakdown of strategies adopted varying by environmental >> issue, form of government, etc gives some sense of patterns and a macro >> view. It provides them some insight on the need to adopt different >> strategies depending on situation. >> >> >> >> Given the award winners include a North American each year but is >> otherwise internationally focused, it also provides some easier bridges to >> the international for students who typically have focused domestically. >> >> >> >> Best, >> >> Geoff >> >> >> >> Geoff Dabelko >> >> Professor and Director, Environmental Studies Program >> >> Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs >> >> The Ridges, Bldg 22 Rm 119 >> >> 1 Ohio University >> >> Athens, OH 45701 USA >> >> T: 740-593-2117 >> >> [email protected] >> >> www.ohio.edu/environmentalstudies >> >> www.facebook.com/OhioES >> >> www.twitter.com/OhioES >> >> www.twitter.com/geoffdabelko >> >> >> >> Senior Advisor, Environmental Change and Security Program >> >> Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington, DC >> >> www.wilsoncenter.org/ecsp >> >> www.newsecuritybeat.org >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On >> Behalf Of *Jessica Green >> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 3:40 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [gep-ed] Assignments for an Enviro Activism class? >> >> >> >> Dear GEP-ed-ers, >> >> It's that time of the summer -- syllabus prep! I'm teaching a class on >> environmental activism. The last time around, I had an assignment where >> the students had to profile an activist organization and provide some >> analysis of its strengths and weaknesses, per the literature we had read. >> It didn't go over as well as I would have liked. >> >> I'm wondering if any of you have assignments that involve engaging with / >> learning about real life activist organizations, and how you've framed them >> and what types of deliverables are involved. Happy to compile and share if >> anyone is interested. >> >> With thanks in advance, >> >> Jessica >> >> >> -- >> >> Assistant Professor, Environmental Studies >> >> New York University >> >> Author,* Rethinking Private Authority* >> <http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10148.html> >> Winner, 2015 ISA Sprout Award, 2015 APSA Caldwell Award, 2015 Levine Prize >> >> Website <https://wp.nyu.edu/jessica_green/> >> >> Advising page <https://goo.gl/Ty0H3E> >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "gep-ed" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "gep-ed" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Timmons > www.climatedevlab.brown.edu > Collaboration|Impact|Mentorship|Sustainability|Justice > > Just out June 2016: *The Globalization and Environment Reader*. Peter > Newell and Timmons Roberts. > http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118964136.html > > J. Timmons Roberts > Ittleson Professor of Environmental Studies and Sociology > Brown University > https://vivo.brown.edu/display/jr17 > Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution, 2012-14 > http://www.brookings.edu/experts/robertst > Co-Director, The Climate and Development Lab: http://www.climatedevlab. > brown.edu > [email protected]; skype: timmonsroberts; on Twitter @timmonsroberts > -- Timmons www.climatedevlab.brown.edu Collaboration|Impact|Mentorship|Sustainability|Justice Just out June 2016: *The Globalization and Environment Reader*. Peter Newell and Timmons Roberts. http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118964136.html J. Timmons Roberts Ittleson Professor of Environmental Studies and Sociology Brown University https://vivo.brown.edu/display/jr17 Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution, 2012-14 http://www.brookings.edu/experts/robertst Co-Director, The Climate and Development Lab: http://www.climatedevlab.brown.edu [email protected]; skype: timmonsroberts; on Twitter @timmonsroberts -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gep-ed" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
