Although there isn’t much academic literature on it (at least in the social 
sciences), studies of construction and demolition waste definitely get at these 
questions (sometimes with a climate perspective). But I just took a look at the 
op-ed and they didn’t make the step that someone else may have pointed out: 
there’s no point in lauding solar fields without confronting the concrete that 
forms the bases of those fields, often in fragile desert ecosystems. I used to 
follow the work of one of my former undergrads in the Amargosa desert 
wilderness, threatened by a large-scale renewable energy project - and some of 
the efforts to come up with a compromise that protected the ecosystems (see 
here 
<https://www.kcet.org/redefine/new-desert-plan-will-help-wildlife-along-the-amargosa-river>
 - published in September 2016, so no guarantees of what’s happened since… 

And here’s a piece that just popped into my mind as a “big picture” overview: 
Zalasiewicz, J., et al. (2017). "Scale and diversity of the physical 
technosphere: A geological perspective." The Anthropocene Review 4(1): 9-22.
        
Best to all!

Kate 

> On Apr 22, 2021, at 12:32 PM, Rafael Friedmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I heard a talk by the head of sustainability at Autocad about 2 years ago at 
> a HAAS/UC Berkeley event on the future of work. She showed the daunting 
> amounts of materials that would be used to further urbanize our growing human 
> population by 2050.  Without rethinking very deeply what Earth can provide 
> sustainably, we will not be able to build a future that offers wellbeing to 
> most of humanity. Your point of the need to align the lovely calls of Biden’s 
> summit (and others) with how our economic systems are set up and the 
> infrastructure we continue to build (vested interests means we always have 
> too much inertia!), is right on the ball.
>  
> I suspect that the reality check will need to partly come from Academia – 
> with quick analyses (we don’t have another 20 years to spare, actually, can’t 
> even spare one more!), coupled with social movements and the threat of 
> product boycotts as well as financial pressure—to get the actions needed by 
> both public and private sectors (as well as our own).
>  
> Rafael
>  
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
>  
> From: Debra Javeline <mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 10:15 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: [gep-ed] RE: Opinion: We Don't Need More Life-Crushing Steel and 
> Concrete
>  
> Dear colleagues,
>  
> Biden announced new commitments on climate action today, and it reminded me 
> that I received not a single response to my query below about the Biden 
> infrastructure plan.  I wonder why.  If the climate plans and the 
> infrastructure plans are not integrated, how can the climate plans succeed?  
> Is no one conducting research on the ideal infrastructure for a 
> climate-altered planet?
>  
> All the best,
> Debra
>  
> From: Debra Javeline <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 10:36 AM
> To: '[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>' 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Opinion: We Don’t Need More Life-Crushing Steel and Concrete
>  
> Dear colleagues,
>  
> Paul Greenberg and Carl Safina have a compelling op-ed in the NYT, “We Don’t 
> Need More Life-Crushing Steel and Concrete: The long-term needs of ecosystems 
> should come before our knee-jerk expectations about infrastructure 
> <https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/opinion/infrastructure-biden-nature.html?fbclid=IwAR3sdOmAFMVPOp5vSgBUfgUBUP2zo4BlQ1O9pU71iEmnSYW3warBXHO5F5Q>.”
>  
> Is there any scholarship related to this topic?  Presumably, those focused on 
> climate change even within Biden’s own government understand the potential 
> harms of an infrastructure program that ignores climate issues, but is there 
> a holistic approach, with the infrastructure people talking to the 
> climate-concerned?  And is the conversation informed by good research on what 
> infrastructure should be rebuilt to maximize mitigation and adaptation 
> efforts?  Does such research exist?  Suggestions for specific publications 
> would be most welcome.
>  
> All the best,
> Debra
>  
> *****
> Debra Javeline
> Associate Professor | Department of Political Science | University of Notre 
> Dame | 2060 Jenkins Nanovic Halls | Notre Dame, IN 46556 | tel: 574-631-2793 
> <tel:(574)%20631-2793>
>  
> Fellow, Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies <http://kroc.nd.edu/>, 
> Kellogg Institute for International Studies <http://nd.edu/~kellogg/>, 
> Nanovic Institute for European Studies <http://nanovic.nd.edu/>
> Core faculty, Russian and East European Studies Program 
> <http://germanandrussian.nd.edu/russian/faculty/program-faculty/RussianandEastEuropeanStudies.shtml>
> Affiliated faculty, Notre Dame Environmental Change Initiative 
> <http://environmentalchange.nd.edu/>
>  
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "gep-ed" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/8b77e9b1c5fed4acdfcc5d8923e55a1e%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/8b77e9b1c5fed4acdfcc5d8923e55a1e%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "gep-ed" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/5099CE0B-8ED2-49D8-9935-D0EBE78BF1F4%40hxcore.ol
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/5099CE0B-8ED2-49D8-9935-D0EBE78BF1F4%40hxcore.ol?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/076DF7F0-153A-450C-8E38-AB16F8F8483C%40berkeley.edu.

Reply via email to