As Sergey Alyoshin wrote: > > Thus, I think the really only safe option is to compare for less than > > a small epsilon rather than equality. > > Maybe for clarity check against DBL_EPSILON instead of 1e-6?
OK, I'll give that a try. I wasn't aware such constant exists. In theory, for a true epsilon, the difference would need to be divided by the base value, but since all relevant base values (π/2, π·3/2) are close enough to 1, I think this step can be skipped. (Layer stack script) > You can make for _each_ merged layer a project file with positioning, rotation > and layer visibility. That doesn't help much for panelization. There's two kind of layer groups: one group forming each sub-board, each using the same translation / rotation values (to be defined / refined while panelizing), and one group forming each output layer. In order to be useful, all the input layers need to be present in a single project. Thanks for your response anyway, so at least, I know there's no easy and obvious option I've been missing. The merge feature itself is already useful enough as it is now, so a „болшое спасибо“ to you for implementing it. Maybe I should ask again for release plans, so this nice feature could be more publically announced. ;-) -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Gerbv-devel mailing list Gerbv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gerbv-devel
