Fine for viewing, but if there are any (larger) diagrams that might need editing - particularly by others - in the future, JPG isn't exactly the happiest of formats to have them available in.
Adrian -----Original Message----- From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 August 2003 17:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: uml (was: documentation) On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 04:38 pm, Daniel Hofstetter wrote: >> Also if any person is interested in knowing the internals, >> they >> should have the necessary documentation with UML diagrams in place and >> how everything fits together. I suggest that every group specified in >> this link >> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheJ2EE/Volunteers- >> _Topi >> cs take care of the necessary design documentation (of the source code >> along with UML diagrams) on the stuff they are working on. This will >> let >> any new person joining the group (to contribute) get a head start on >> the >> design and implementation. This way they will be more productive and >> also be encouraged, by having fewer hurdles to cross... > > Is there a convention by the ASF using a certain file format for uml > diagrams? I think it's not useful if one uses the format of Rational > Rose and an > other > uses an > incompatible format... Anything viewable on the web is good. Say PNG, GIF, JPG etc. :) James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
