just a kinda unrelated, but important note ... can you tar/gz your attachments next time if they are reaching a size of several Megs?
(a tar.gz archive of your images would have been about 800 KByte big in size) regards daniel s. haischt -- Am 15.08.2003 2:28 Uhr schrieb "Ralph Apel" unter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi there, > > it might be worth distunguishing between > > 1) generating diagrams from source for purposes of documentation (wiki > etc) > > 2) importing UML into a tool or Ide-plugin for analysis and modification > > IMHO purpose (1) should be scripted (with human revision, of course). I > think http://www.spinellis.gr/sw/umlgraph/ in conjunction with > http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/ (javadoc, UmlGraph > Doclet, .dot intermediate format, final output to dozens of graphics > formats) may be used...(Please see attachment quick shots) > Purpose (2) should be left to the personal preferences of each > contributor (at least for now), the resulting sources (patches) being > the definitive means of transfer. > > UML-coded proposals or contributions to discussion may be generated from > UML-tools/plugins in bitmapped or vector (SVG?) form. > > Indeed, what may be necessary, is a standard for navigation in bitmapped > or svged diagrams. > > May be someone from the Javascript scene can design a generalized > framework for zooming and panning in bitmapped or svged diagrams? > > On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 18:33, Marc Ernst Eddy van Woerkom wrote: >>> Speaking as someone who can't afford a copy of Rational Rose >> >> or Together.. I wonder what shows up in Borldand's latest free offerings. >> >> >>> ArgoUML springs to mind as the obvious suggestion, but I'd love to hear >>> about any others. :) >> >> What about its commercial brother Poseidon? >> Is their free version crippled or not usable for other reasons? >> >> Regards, >> Marc >> >> > >
