Re: uml (was: documentation)

[Jason Dillon]

What are the open UML file formats... pick one.  If we find that we 
want to change later, we will.

Do or do not, but lets stop talking about doing when things could be 
done ;-)

--jason
On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 11:18  PM, Adrian Jackson wrote:
Fine for viewing, but if there are any (larger) diagrams that might 
need
editing - particularly by others - in the future, JPG isn't exactly the
happiest of formats to have them available in.

Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 August 2003 17:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: uml (was: documentation)

On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 04:38  pm, Daniel Hofstetter wrote:
         Also if any person is interested in knowing the internals,
they
should have the necessary documentation with UML diagrams in place
and
how everything fits together. I suggest that every group specified in
this link
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheJ2EE/Volunteers-
_Topi
cs take care of the necessary design documentation (of the source
code
along with UML diagrams) on the stuff they are working on. This will

let
any new person joining the group (to contribute) get a head start on

the
design and implementation. This way they will be more productive and
also be encouraged, by having fewer hurdles to cross...
Is there a convention by the ASF using a certain file format for uml
diagrams? I think it's not useful if one uses the format of Rational
Rose and an
other
uses an
incompatible format...
Anything viewable on the web is good. Say PNG, GIF, JPG etc. :)
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/