Patch Set 1:

(2 comments)

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/7572/1//COMMIT_MSG
Commit Message:

Line 19: err = eeprom_write( EEPROM_CFG_START_ADDR + ((int)&ee.cfg.v1.sysInfo - 
(int)&ee)
> I don't think it's good idea to indicate how
Sure, I guess this was never intended as the final commit message to be merged. 
I don't /know/ why it makes sense, because I'm not a C programmer, but I'm told 
it should be pretty clear to anyone who is, and me, well, I'm not in the habit 
of explaining what I don't understand. 
One thing for sure, it was totally broken before this and works after. - I 
should have mentioned maybe the ticket where I demonstrate this in the commit?
https://osmocom.org/issues/3121


https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/c/7572/1/src/osmo-bts-sysmo/eeprom.c
File src/osmo-bts-sysmo/eeprom.c:

Line 498:             err = eeprom_read( EEPROM_CFG_START_ADDR + 
((int)&ee.cfg.v1.sysInfo - (int)&ee), sizeof(ee.cfg.v1.sysInfo), (char 
*)&ee.cfg.v1.sysInfo );
> I fail to see how this change can make it work, as afaik the sysmobts is a 
The only difference? What about that '*', It appears to be key.


-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/7572
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iaa7318387ad7bb248c261b1f428019244039e7d2
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Keith Whyte <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: Keith Whyte <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Pau Espin Pedrol <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vadim Yanitskiy <[email protected]>
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes

Reply via email to