On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Andrew Apted wrote: > Christoph Egger writes: > > > I have now produced a patch of my currently done work. > > The patch compiles for me, but I've nothing tested yet, so be beware. > > > > I post it, because I want have some comments about it. > > OK, some comments :). Looks pretty good so far. Except for the > FILE_PPM and FILE_BMP defines -- are they just temporary ? > Yes, for now. If it will be removed or not, decides the further hacking... Christoph Egger E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Andrew Apted
- ggv (Re: file-target) Cesar Crusius
- Re: ggv (Re: file-target) Christoph Egger
- Re: ggv (Re: file-target) Cesar Crusius
- Re: ggv (Re: file-target) Niklas H�glund
- Re: file-target Andrew Apted
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Andrew Apted
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Marcus Sundberg
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Marcus Sundberg
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Marcus Sundberg
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
- Re: file-target Marcus Sundberg
- Re: file-target Christoph Egger
