> Sure, that's fine - but that's not what I was referring too. I'm
> against pruning out debian files for rpm's and vice versa. Maybe my
> response wasn't correct for Curtis' orriginal question . . .
Actually I am against pruning anything out. The size of these
files is very small. As a debian user I still might want to look
at the rpm spec file even though I am using the debian stuff.
I don't see the issue with or reason for links can someone enlighten me?
I was concerned about generating actual binary packages (rpm or .deb)
If binary packages are made for deb systems on a redhat
box, it is possible to have broken executables due to library issues.
I just noted that we can build and supply source packages (SRPM and source
debs) easily but that it might be best to *not* supply binary
packages.
(Except if they are built on and for a specific target system.)
Does that clarify?
Regards,
Curtis
