On 16 Jul 2001, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:

> Let's see if we have agreement.
>
> Directory structure:
>
> <libname>/
> <libname>/dist/
> <libname>/dist/rpm/
> <libname>/dist/debian/
> <libname>/dist/win32/
> <libname>/dist/bsd/
> <libname>/dist/solaris/
>
>
> Where <libname> expands to libgii, libggi, libgalloc, etc.

Yep, agree. That is, what I am trying to say the whole time.

> Do we create the entire directory skeleton even for empty dirs or do we
> create each subdir as needed when packagine files are created?

No empty dirs, please.

> RPM spec files are reference files that may or may not be used by a
> particular distribution, but will work for a general system.

If you define a LSB-conform system a "general system" then I agree.
(LSB = Linux Standard Base).

> Any thing else?

No. I see, you got me finally. :)


CU,

Christoph Egger
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to