> > On Sunday 15 December 2002 16:01, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > libbse, libgic and libgpf are NO extensions. Thus, how should we mark > > > ggi libs, which are NO extensions? IMO, extensions should be > > > distinguishable from non-extensions by their (package-)names. > > > > I clearly seem to fail to understand why this would be important, but > > anyway, this is not a problem (possibly an aesthetic issue, though). > > Well, ok... When there are no objections within the next 6 hours, > I'll start to rename _all_ ggi libs (libgpf, libgic and libbse) and > extensions > (libgalloc, libbuf, libovl, libblt, libwmh, libgcp, libvideo, libxmi, > etc.) > to the form of libggi<name>. (i.e. libggigpf, libggigic, libggibse, > libggigalloc, libggibuf, > libggiovl, etc.)
I am done with that now. All is in CVS. libwmh and libgcp are repackaged (see http://www.ggi-project.org/modules.html) Martin: Now again, it is your turn :) -- CU, Christoph Egger E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!
