Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martin Baulig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, then I think you misunderstood me. > > > > What I suggested was added XCF as a nice add-on to gdk-pixbuf for > > the situation where gdk-pixbuf is used under the GPL. > > > > Of cause, this means that you can't use XCF loading in a proprietary > > app where you use gdk-pixbuf under the LGPL. > > Maybe. It's a big can of worms though - can Red Hat and SuSE ship the > XCF add-on, for example? Probably not. Hmm, yes. -- Martin Baulig [EMAIL PROTECTED] (private) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Jay Cox
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Alan Cox
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Marc Lehmann
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Havoc Pennington
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Jens Finke
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Martin Baulig
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Havoc Pennington
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Martin Baulig
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Havoc Pennington
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Martin Baulig
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Miguel de Icaza
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Sven Neumann
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Sri Ramkrishna
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Nils Philippsen
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Alan Cox
- Re: XCF loader for gdk-pixbuf Adam D. Moss
