El sáb, 04-06-2016 a las 18:26 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
> Personally, I'm fine with a rant that has helpful bits of information
> in it that could be extracted. All I can extract from your rant is
> that you are annoyed so much that you post knowingly false
> information. 

What "knowingly flase information"?

> How does it help us make GIMP better?

Hopefully making people involved take one step back and re-evaluate how
they are addressing the target audience's needs.

> > Why is it the goal of GIMP 2.10 to produce a GEGL-based version
> > with
> > feature parity with the current stable?
> Where did you even read this?

Oh, come on! You say you never heard that?
That the linear mode was a side effect from switching to GEGL, that
some features like that weren't supposed to be in 2.10 as the minimum
goal was producing a GEGL version of the 2.8 features, and anything
else would be a plus?
Iirc it was in the context of the first discussion about color
management (supporting other colorspaces than just sRGB). And iirc it
sounded as a pretext for kicking it to the future roadmap.
I don't have a link to a ml thread or an IRC log, so you'll have to
take my word.


gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

Reply via email to