On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:55 PM, C R wrote:
> Speaking as a digital painter (samples available upon request), I can tell
> you the Pencil tool does not replace a pencil brush. In fact, the pencil
> tool acts nothing like a pencil at all. :) Could re-name it the
> "pixel-tool".... but it absolutely sucks at being a pencil in just about
> every way it possibly could. ;)
Perhaps you could list specific characteristics of a Pencil tool that
would not suck? :)
If the general idea is to make the Pencil tool (more) useful, pointing
out existing deficiencies, then sketching a proposal would be a lot
> Your input is welcome. It's important to find a good solution that makes
> GIMP easier to use. Great ideas don't come from only seasoned digital
> painters, so thanks for all your input.
> So thanks again for your contribution to the conversation.
> I'm not willing to get rid of it unless we can put the functionality
> somewhere else.
This part of the conversation puzzles me. Elle is acknowledged
contributor to GIMP as per AUTHORS, but you aren't. So how come _you_
welcome _her_ input? And who is that "we" that can put the
functionality somewhere else? Am I missing a vital point here?
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: email@example.com
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list