Hmm .. this is a pretty cool writeup. :) On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:10:15PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote: [...] > CONCLUSIONS - THE 60% WAY TO CMYK > > If one were so bold as to draw some conclusions, they would > probably be very similar to these:
[...] > 3. Educate users about channels and what they can be used for - on this > Systems I was frequently confronted with users who were unhappy with > the gimp because it didn't allow them to do things as easily as under > photoshop. Often(!) I was able to get exactly the same results, with > a much easier and faster sequence than the one that user used with > Photoshop..... Can you remember any specific examples of this? It would help show us where the gimp's channels and layers setup does things "better" in some sense. Malcolm -- Tolkien is hobbit-forming. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
