On 13 Jun 2002, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > RaphaXl Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't agree. The core and libgimp is GPL and LGPL and should be > advertized as such. Noone will ever link against one of the affected > plug-ins and calling them through the PDB shouldn't be an issue. And if they do, they will most assuredly see the copyright statement and license in the source. Rockwalrus _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: Gimp i... David Neary
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: G... Stephen J Baker
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: G... Christian Rose
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: Gimp i... Nick Lamb
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.2: G... Rapha�l Quinet
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.... Nathan Carl Summers
- [Gimp-developer] LSystem plugin, M.Gomuli... David Hodson
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gimp1.... Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412: gi... Rapha�l Quinet
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#148412... Sven Neumann
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#1... Nathan Carl Summers
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#1... Rapha�l Quinet
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#1... Nick Lamb
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#1... Branko Collin
- Re: [Gimp-developer] [Fwd: Bug#1... Sven Neumann
