> [filesystem within a file]
It's a nice idea in theory, but makes it quite hard to write a parser for.
MS Word files (until recently) were basically FAT filesystems, which makes
it easy to handle under Windows but harder to parse when you don't have a
convenient DLL to do it lying around.
The FlashPix format (now little used?) is also a FAT filesystem; it was this
fact that persuaded me that writing a Gimp FlashPix loader wouldn't be
So sure, consider the idea, but bear in mind it might be hard to pull off.
When this discussion started, I didn't like the idea of XML with binary data
portions. I liked the current binary, tagged, format we have, and thought
that it should just be extended. However, after the recent discussion I've
come around to quite liking an ar-style archive with a XML catalog, XML
metadata, and texels as separate members. I think this is roughly what
Leonard was suggesting; we should listen to the voice of experience.
Gimp-developer mailing list