On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 01:04:23AM +0000, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
>  > According to you, this shouldn't be. Additionally, one would assume that
>  > these are additional restrictions that are explicitly forbidden by the GPL
>  > itself.

First of all, it should have been "could", not "would" in the above

> But these restrictions are placed by the MySQL copyright holders
> themselves, aren't they?

Yes. But they can't license a product to me saying it's licensed under the
GPL and then, in another part of the documentation _outside_ the license,
place restrictions not mentioned in the GPL.

This is at best contradicting.

Also, I am quite sure that not everybody who contributed code to mysql
is aware that the GPL is, in fact, not the whole license.

That is, *iff* these are additional restrictions, which is a point of view
not everybody needs to share.

My point is solely that most arguing (even by me, I might interpret the
license totally correctly, yet still fail to predict reality) about the
requirements of the GPL is moot if somebody goes to court :)

      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED]      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to