On 8/24/05, woc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/24/05, Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, and you contradicted this statement when you said that C wasn't > > portable enough for you. There are differing definitions of what > > "portability" means. > > C is definitely less portable than I'd like.
I presume you mean this in the sense that you'd want to write it and distribute it as-is for your users in this cases? If you want, you can always cross compile for Windows on a Linux system, and develop on Linux. (Not sure about vice-versa.) Mac OS X, IIRC, comes with a compiler; Linux might, if you specify it, but various people use deb binaries or rpms. *sighs* If Windows compatability isn't a issue immediately (future problem) then, of course, Python would be the way to go for your circumstance. >From what I gather, many people seem to use the Python bindings. > I really do appreciate you helping me get oriented. That is quite > useful -- I'm sure you've saved me days or weeks of searching the docs > for how to make script fu work when basically I would have been wrong > to try that route. At least that got straightened out. -- ~Mike - Just my two cents - No man is an island, and no man is unable. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimpfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer