On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:44:56 +0100
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Well, I don't know why. All I can do is look at the header file and
> documentation of littleCMS. What you are saying looks like there is a
> bug in lcms. Either the code or the header file is wrong. Or we are
> simply misinterpreting things. Perhaps it would be a good thing to bring
> this up on the lcms mailing-list. If you do that, please add me to the
> Cc.
> 
> 
> Sven


I think that there is a difference of recognition to "ProofingIntent" in
between us and them.

In "LCMSAPI.TXT", they are describing in the explanation of
"cmsCreateProofingTransform" function 
as follows:

> ProofingIntent: Is the intent for translating emulated colors.
>                 Default is INTENT_ABSOLUTE_COLORIMETRIC. 

I guess that four words "into Output color space" are missing. 


# I forgot to explain the following in the last message.
# They are the one having described it based on an actual function
definition.
#
#   [Input]->(Intent)->[PCS]->(Intent*1)->[Proofing]->
#         ->(Rel. colorimetric)->[PCS]->(ProofingIntent)->[Output]
#
# *1 If Intent is Absolute colorimetric, it is replaced with Relative
colorimetric.
#
# In the above chart, if ProofingProfile is NULL, the chart is changed as
follows:
#
#   [Input]->(Intent)->[PCS]->(Intent)->[Output]

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Softproof-rendering-intent-tf2902147.html#a8129287
Sent from the Gimp Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to