On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:53:59 +0200, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What about the case where the original quality was 96 or 98, and it's
> resaved at the same quality level? My quick test showed a slight
> decrease in file size, but probably very little in the way of image
I suspect that could be the result of some of the less important
parameters getting a similar default, the encoding method (int/fp) or
simply the algorithm efficiencies.
eg An earlier post indicated Jpeg:sampling-factor also changed from
2x1,1x1,1x1 to 2x2,1x1,1x1.
Gimp-developer mailing list