On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:53:59 +0200, Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:

> What about the case where the original quality was 96 or 98, and it's
> resaved at the same quality level?  My quick test showed a slight
> decrease in file size, but probably very little in the way of image
> degradation.

Thanks,

I suspect that could be the result of some of the less important  
parameters getting a similar default, the encoding method (int/fp) or  
simply the algorithm efficiencies.

eg An earlier post indicated Jpeg:sampling-factor also changed from   
2x1,1x1,1x1 to 2x2,1x1,1x1.

/gg
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to