Sven Neumann wrote:
> so far we didn't have a well-defined development roadmap. I would like
> to propose that this is changed for GIMP 2.6 and beyond. Hopefully this
> can help to acomplish two goals:
> - GIMP 2.6 should not take too long to develop
> - we will get more developers
> Before we start the discussion of the roadmap, perhaps we should talk
> about how we should go about getting to a roadmap. Should we do it on
> this list, do we want to use a Wiki, Bugzilla or anything like that?
> IMO it would be best if people proposed features here so that they can
> be discussed on the list. We should then collect these proposals
> somewhere and try to decide on milestones for them later. It would
> probably help if we try to be strict bout only proposing a single
> feature per mail.
> What do you think?
> Gimp-developer mailing list
I personally want to participate in the development of GIMP 2.6 (if my
and I agree, Sven, that this list is the best way to manage that.
Gimp-developer mailing list