A change in file formats should be postponed until a bump in the major
version number takes place (per GNU coding standards?). But my
proposal of adding parasites containing layer group meta-data to files
saved in the current XCF standard is indeed merely an interim
solution, permitting time for a new format to be decided upon (not an
insignificant task in itself).
Quoting Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/26/07, saulgoode wrote:
>> Finally, there should be an effort to maintain integrity of the XCF
>> file format by converting between the core implementation of layer
>> groups and parasites attached to drawables during saves and loads of
>> XCF files (older GIMP versions would read the files but lose the layer
>> grouping information).
> IIRC, it was planned to nuke current XCF at some stage of development
> in favour of an XML based file format (XCF2, OpenRaster, whatever).
Gimp-developer mailing list