On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 18:52 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 1:03 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is a nice start, but I think we need a lot more information in the
> > short description. So one row per task is certainly not going to be
> > sufficient. But it's probably a good idea to finalize the structure and
> > layout before we go into filling in all the details.
> I trolled through Bugzilla and added anything with a 2.6 milestone. I
> *think* this is now a list of all possible tasks for 2.6.
Eeek, no! I thought I had tried to make the purpose of this list clear.
We already have Bugzilla and its milestones for the purpose of reminding
us what needs to be done for 2.6. The task list is supposed to list a
few tasks that we consider important and that show where GIMP
development is heading. Your list now has about five times too many
items. It will be rather difficult to get to the final list from there.
Gimp-developer mailing list