On Nov 26, 2007 1:58 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 18:52 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote:
> > On Nov 22, 2007 1:03 AM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is a nice start, but I think we need a lot more information in the
> > > short description. So one row per task is certainly not going to be
> > > sufficient. But it's probably a good idea to finalize the structure and
> > > layout before we go into filling in all the details.
> > I trolled through Bugzilla and added anything with a 2.6 milestone. I
> > *think* this is now a list of all possible tasks for 2.6.
> Eeek, no! I thought I had tried to make the purpose of this list clear.
> We already have Bugzilla and its milestones for the purpose of reminding
> us what needs to be done for 2.6. The task list is supposed to list a
> few tasks that we consider important and that show where GIMP
> development is heading. Your list now has about five times too many
> items. It will be rather difficult to get to the final list from there.
OK - I thought it was too long also. Ignore the third version. I'm
beginning to see the light - we need a short list of the most
important items, with a nice description for each... I'll try again
Gimp-developer mailing list