On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:54:59 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 15:31 -0300, Guillermo Espertino wrote: >> About the graying out toolbox, dockers and elements not used when no >> image is open, I think it breaks a functionality that is already present >> in gimp: the ability to custumize the interface (moving dialogs to >> dockers, changing the dimensions and position of elements, etc.) >> That's, imo, a regression. Having to open an image to be able to >> customize the interface adds an extra step that has no purpose. > > You are making some wrong assumptions here. The toolbox is fully > functional and so are the docks. Nothing prevents you from doing all the > things that you could have done without an image opened. They do all > still work and will continue to work. > so why are they greyed out ? it is a fairly universally established metaphore that greyed out means disabled. I dont think they should be disabled but the current situation seems to be niether on nor the other and in being a non standard state will confuse the user (as the earlier comment demonstrates). If they are active and have a ligitimate function in this context why are they grey? /gg > > Sven > > > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-developer mailing list > Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer > -- .*. /V\ (/ \) ( ) ^^_^^ _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
