Dang. I wish I knew that before I coded up the box blur... Does this mean that I would have to code up a new plugin from scratch, or is there a GEGL version of it out there already? (Sorry, I'm totally unfamiliar with this GEGL stuff.)
-Winston On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Martin Nordholts <ense...@gmail.com> wrote: > Winston Chang wrote: > > I took a look at the svn history of unsharp-mask.c (I'm the original > > author) and saw that the fix for bug #166406 stopped using a lookup > > table called ctable. This was because it slowed things down a lot for > > large values of radius, due to cache overloading. > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166406 > > > > After the fix, the lookup table is no longer being used for the > > blurring algorithm, but it's still being generated and traversed > > during the blur, so I have a patch that removes all that useless code, > > without affecting functionality at all. What's the best way to submit > > it, as I can't commit to the SVN repository? > > > Hi! > > I want to mention that since we are in the progress of migrating to GEGL > we generally prefer that people make sure the GEGL counterpart works > well rather than maintaining the legacy 8 bpc code. A patch for GEGL is > much more attractive than a patch for an old GIMP plug-in. > > That being said, the best way to submit patches is to open a bug report > at bugs.gimp.org and attach it there. > > BR, > Martin >
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
