> > Hi!
> > I want to mention that since we are in the progress of migrating to GEGL
> > we generally prefer that people make sure the GEGL counterpart works
> > well rather than maintaining the legacy 8 bpc code. A patch for GEGL is
> > much more attractive than a patch for an old GIMP plug-in.
> There is no point in discouraging people from fixing / improving
> code that will be in use for at least one or two more releases,
> despite all GEGL goodness.
OK - I'll submit the patches via bugzilla, then.
I've looked at the GEGL code now and played with it a bit, and I have to say
it looks very nice and seems to be quite fast for gaussian blur and unsharp
Gimp-developer mailing list