Hi Martin,

On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> On 08/02/2009 01:50 PM, Roman Joost wrote:
> >> does not change the fact that it would be nice to have a
> >> 'property-changed' signal as a convenience if you have the need to
> >> listen property changes
> > So ... I'm just wondering. If I like to use two signals for the
> > XMPModel, does it still make sense to inherit from GtkTreeStore? I mean,
> > I can't currently see any benefits if I inherit from GtkTreeStore.
> In general, aggregation is preferable to inheritance because the former 
> results in more dynamic code with less assumptions. If you think 
> aggregation makes more sense than inheritance in this case, then I'd say 
> go ahead and use aggregation, i.e. have a GtkTreeStore as an instance 
> member in XMPModel
Should I redo the patch posted for the bug I've created at:


and implement the schema change signal (which is missing), or can
someone review the patch again?

Roman Joost
www: http://www.romanofski.de
email: romanof...@gimp.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to